Ready ... Steady... Go?

Mark Aikman • May 18, 2021

How do you set the right speed for your transformation?

Well, we can now all go to the bingo, join a zumba class or go on a rollercoaster. So that’s my back-to-normal sorted.

Variants of Concern aside, we still look to be on course for back to (roughly) normal within a few months. Which means all those suspended transformation programmes are starting to come back to life. The need for the changes they represent will be even greater now, following delays of perhaps 12-18 months or longer. The demand for transformation at warp-speed will be loud.

Steady on, though. It’s quite natural that organisations now want to transform quickly: they’ll see the much-needed business benefits soonest. But obviously, it’s also necessary for the credibility of your transformation that it’s (largely) right , as well. So there’s a balance to be struck between speed and perfection.

So, how do you strike that balance?

Anything is possible

A quick response is always possible. We all proved that last year when the Covid-19 pandemic hit all countries of the world and new processes such as remote working had to be introduced almost overnight. There was no choice. But I’d argue that a quick response is always possible, and that availability of choice has nothing to do with it.

In one of my roles, I was tasked with deployment on what was then the fastest and largest ever separation in the food industry. In 22 months, we set the business up as an independent producer, working on all continents.

Achieving that deadline was due to hard graft and taking one significant decision: to use out-of-the-box solutions, with little to no customisation. We set up the new organisation with new processes, as dictated by the off-the-shelf technology, balanced with a clear focus on customer requirements. So very rapid transformation really can be done.

How to set the Speed Dial

Yes, it can be done – but is it right to do it? I’d suggest there is one consideration that will tell you how quickly you need to go. The customers.

The customers need to be central. Their expectations will give you cues for how quickly you need to transform. How soon do your customers need this change? More to the point, what have your competitors done that has changed your customers’ expectations?

We need accurate information, constantly updated, on what the customers are thinking and how they are behaving. And the transformation activity needs to be buzzing around these views and needs, working very quickly and nimbly if customer needs and expectations change.

High speed. The food-industry Programme described above was entirely in response to customer expectations. They wanted a provider whose systems would jigsaw-puzzle-piece lock onto their own, with no loss of service as the company’s ownership transitioned. It was the only way the new company would keep the old company’s clients.

And because that organisation was going through such a seismic change, the workforce recognised the magnitude of the demerger and therefore expected, and largely accepted, very significant changes to everything they did and how they did it. That kind of speed is an option for when the situation is … drastic.

That’s very tough to do at speed unless everyone the organisation is clear about the external driver of the change – for example, that we’re in a “change or die” scenario. In these circumstances, your degree of change can be enormous (although your sponsorship and communication must still be beyond excellent).

So if that description represents your situation, then yes, put the pedal to the metal. Go for out-of-the-box and a rigid adherence to delivering only the minimum viable product.

But if it’s not about the business's very existence, then...

Variable speed. Not every digital change is responding to something drastic within or around the business, but nonetheless, the customer still needs to be the central point of focus. Common sense.

You’ll need to offer a rapid response to the customers’ ever-changing needs. And needs change all the time: for example, people in Leeds didn’t know they needed digital bus stops to tell them precisely when the next bus would arrive, until Transport for London showed them how handy it could be….

So be prepared to bring forward parts of your Programme that are customer facing whenever the need becomes apparent. So how has the pandemic with its business interruptions and effect on customer behaviour changed the needs and wants of your buyers? What does that do to your list of priorities? Can you really still run your transformation in the same order as you had planned it at Christmas 2019?

Steady speed . In less extreme circumstances, I’d advise that technology change – especially when affecting people and processes - has one essential sister-principle: you must win hearts and minds. If your customers are not urgently demanding change, you can take a little bit more time to bring the organisation along on the journey – always assuming the CFO will let you spend money with no sign of an immediate ROI…

And guess what? This couldn’t be a better moment. People within your organisation have been through so much upheaval in the last year or so that they’re actually more open-to-change than they’ve ever been. Yes, you’ll have a few who crave the comfort-blanket of the old-normal, but in fact, most people have proudly proved how they can adapt to change. They recognise there have been some great ideas to come out of our enforced circumstances – from sign-in QR codes to table-service for pints – and with that positive mindset, they may well be more accepting of doing things differently.

But it might be only a small window of opportunity, so make the most of it. Even if you’re planning on taking it slow, it really is now time to go, go, go!


This is based on an extract from Mark Aikman’s book Uncommon Sense: Alternative Thinking on Digital Transformation

Amazon location: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Uncommon-Sense-Alternative-Thinking-Transformation-ebook/dp/B08KSG513Q

Apple location: https://books.apple.com/gb/book/uncommon-sense/id1536877985

May 9, 2025
Many companies initially believe they can handle complex ERP implementations internally. After all, who knows their business better? Grant du Preez of Ignition Transformation looks at what to consider before deciding to go it alone: and he’s a guy who’s seen all the elephant-traps. He advises:  Don’t underestimate how complicated it will be Enterprise Resource Planning implementations are challenging under normal circumstances. When layered onto major business transformations like carve-outs or mergers, they become exponentially more complex. These scenarios introduce unique challenges, such as: · Multiple legacy systems that must be harmonised · Interdependent business processes needing careful redesign · Data migration requiring deep technical expertise · Compressed timelines driven by business imperatives · Organisational resistance amid broader change And all that is needed simultaneously… At best you might see missed business opportunities if you can’t make the speed: at worst, you’ll spend too much or possibly even see a failed implementation. Remember Transition Service Agreements (TSAs) are real rules TSAs present some of the most significant challenges during carve-outs and acquisitions. These agreements typically impose strict and legally-binding deadlines for transitioning from parent company systems. There are substantial financial penalties for delays. Hard cash. To work within TSAs, you will need: · Proven strategies for meeting TSA deadlines · Templates for identifying and prioritising critical path items · Tactics for negotiating more favourable terms when necessary · Experience balancing short-term TSA requirements with long-term system needs It’s a Matterhorn-steep learning curve if you haven’t done it before. Make sure you have just one source of truth During business transformations, competing narratives inevitably emerge. Typically, there are strands on requirements, data structures, and implementation approaches. It soon becomes 3D chess. You will need to establish what we call a "single source of truth" – authoritative references for decisions that prevent revisiting settled issues. This includes: · Documented design decisions with clear ownership · Master data governance frameworks · Process models validated by business owners · Requirements traceability matrices Without this discipline, projects often circle Heathrow, cycling through the same decisions repeatedly, wasting valuable time and resources. You need to know what’s going on You will need complete transparency across all aspects of an ERP programme. Every day, you have to be in a position to give your stakeholders an unvarnished view of: · Project status against critical milestones · Resource allocation and utilisation · Emerging risks and mitigation strategies · Budget consumption and projections This transparency creates accountability and enables early intervention when issues arise. But it can’t be a hefty administrative burden that slows progress. Get the top corridor on board You will need to secure the right level of commitment from organisational leadership and key stakeholders. You will have to be clear about the specific involvement needed at different stages. Most importantly, you will need to be listened-to when you communicate these needs to busy executives. Executive steering committees, dedicated business process owners and carefully structured sign-off procedures will help ensure decisions are made by the right people at the right time. Without this orchestration, ERP implementations often stall waiting for critical decisions or proceed with insufficient business input. Remember DIY may only LOOK like the cheaper option Whilst engaging experienced consultants requires investment, the return is substantial. Looking at dozens of implementations we've led or observed, those with experienced consultants consistently: · Complete on time or with minimal delays · Stay closer to budgeted costs · Deliver more of the promised business benefits · Create less disruption to ongoing operations Organisations embarking on ERP transformations during carve-outs, mergers, or other significant business changes face a choice: invest in experienced guidance upfront or pay far more in delays, overruns, and missed opportunities later. DIY-er, beware!
May 7, 2025
Five questions to ask providers of business transformation programmes
By Mark Aikman November 7, 2022
How to write reports that busy people will read
By Mark Aikman March 7, 2022
Thanks to our good friends at Future Processing for inviting us to make a guest appearance! On their blog, I've shared some ideas about what to consider in order to get best-fit suppliers: https://www.future-processing.com/blog/selecting-a-supplier-natural-selection/
By Mark Aikman October 19, 2021
IT's supplier relationship need to stop using the master-servant model. Partnership gets more done - and to a much higher standard.
By Sharon Gregory September 7, 2021
Ideas for analysing and dealing with resistance to change in transformation programmes
By Mark Aikman August 10, 2021
Considerations when transitioning from development to BAU
By Mark Aikman July 20, 2021
Support for surviving and thriving after the pandemic from Ignition Transformation
By Mark Aikman July 8, 2021
Three different leadership styles to steer you through a crisis
By Mark Aikman July 1, 2021
How to have better and/or fewer meetings
Show More