Raw transparency, delivered deadlines and collaborative ownership

May 7, 2025

Five questions to ask providers of business transformation programmes

You’ve made an acquisition. You’ve got a value creation plan. You now need to execute on it. So how do you select the right supplier to transform what you’ve bought in the time you have?


Mark Aikman of Ignition Transformation specialises in global high-risk separations and integrations. He suggests finding a supplier that works to your agenda by asking the following five questions:

 

1.     How will you give me insights on which I can base my decisions with confidence?

Faced with this question, a typical response will be to go straight to detail on data and dashboards. 

However, a much more compelling answer is one based on the supplier’s concept of information. A truly useful supplier will evidence an attitude of permanent raw transparency, offering 100% honesty at all times. If you are assured this is the supplier’s operating style, you can know that you are always in possession of the real facts (however unpalatable), coming from one version of the truth. You can trust that your information is reliable and that there will be no awkward surprises further on. Therefore, you can trust the supplier.


2.     What’s your methodology?

Every supplier likes to prove they’ve done this before. To give the illusion of trustworthiness and experience, many will evidence this by describing their failsafe methodology. Beware.

It is not possible to apply a fixed methodology to all transformations – or even to, say, all carve-outs. There is never an exact duplication of circumstances. And even if there appears to be strong similarity to a previous project at the start, circumstances change as programmes progress.

So look for a supplier with a proven framework and excellent governance practices, certainly. But choose one who can demonstrate the adaptability of their method or plan for an infinite variety of circumstances. Ask for case studies and examples of pivots.


3.     What would your last three clients say about you and TSAs?

TSAs are always real rules. Yet some providers view them simply as helpful suggestions with elasticity or negotiability.

Look for a supplier with a proven record of delivering to TSAs. Ideally, suppliers who are used to short project windows or have delivered to extremely tight deadlines will be the most mindful of the need for speed coupled to thoroughness. Ask for references.


4.     What will our relationship be?

Answers here will fall on a spectrum characterised from “you can sit back, relax and enjoy the ride” to “we’ll be on the phone every 12 minutes.”

You need an answer that isn’t based on frequency of contact or customer service, but on collaborative ownership. A good supplier will deal with all the minor decisions and implementation activities without your involvement. But they will also bring forward any significant issues or changes, accompanied by a choice of solutions and the rationale supporting each one. This way, you retain control and oversight but with the freedom to trust the supplier to progress the programme.


5.     When will you walk?

 

A weaker supplier makes the mistake of over-reassurance. They will offer to stay until you’re entirely satisfied that there’s nothing left to do or check. That’s expensive.


The best answer here is that your supplier will cease their involvement at the exact moment they become more cost than value. The best suppliers never outstay their welcome.


And on that note: goodnight!

May 9, 2025
Many companies initially believe they can handle complex ERP implementations internally. After all, who knows their business better? Grant du Preez of Ignition Transformation looks at what to consider before deciding to go it alone: and he’s a guy who’s seen all the elephant-traps. He advises:  Don’t underestimate how complicated it will be Enterprise Resource Planning implementations are challenging under normal circumstances. When layered onto major business transformations like carve-outs or mergers, they become exponentially more complex. These scenarios introduce unique challenges, such as: · Multiple legacy systems that must be harmonised · Interdependent business processes needing careful redesign · Data migration requiring deep technical expertise · Compressed timelines driven by business imperatives · Organisational resistance amid broader change And all that is needed simultaneously… At best you might see missed business opportunities if you can’t make the speed: at worst, you’ll spend too much or possibly even see a failed implementation. Remember Transition Service Agreements (TSAs) are real rules TSAs present some of the most significant challenges during carve-outs and acquisitions. These agreements typically impose strict and legally-binding deadlines for transitioning from parent company systems. There are substantial financial penalties for delays. Hard cash. To work within TSAs, you will need: · Proven strategies for meeting TSA deadlines · Templates for identifying and prioritising critical path items · Tactics for negotiating more favourable terms when necessary · Experience balancing short-term TSA requirements with long-term system needs It’s a Matterhorn-steep learning curve if you haven’t done it before. Make sure you have just one source of truth During business transformations, competing narratives inevitably emerge. Typically, there are strands on requirements, data structures, and implementation approaches. It soon becomes 3D chess. You will need to establish what we call a "single source of truth" – authoritative references for decisions that prevent revisiting settled issues. This includes: · Documented design decisions with clear ownership · Master data governance frameworks · Process models validated by business owners · Requirements traceability matrices Without this discipline, projects often circle Heathrow, cycling through the same decisions repeatedly, wasting valuable time and resources. You need to know what’s going on You will need complete transparency across all aspects of an ERP programme. Every day, you have to be in a position to give your stakeholders an unvarnished view of: · Project status against critical milestones · Resource allocation and utilisation · Emerging risks and mitigation strategies · Budget consumption and projections This transparency creates accountability and enables early intervention when issues arise. But it can’t be a hefty administrative burden that slows progress. Get the top corridor on board You will need to secure the right level of commitment from organisational leadership and key stakeholders. You will have to be clear about the specific involvement needed at different stages. Most importantly, you will need to be listened-to when you communicate these needs to busy executives. Executive steering committees, dedicated business process owners and carefully structured sign-off procedures will help ensure decisions are made by the right people at the right time. Without this orchestration, ERP implementations often stall waiting for critical decisions or proceed with insufficient business input. Remember DIY may only LOOK like the cheaper option Whilst engaging experienced consultants requires investment, the return is substantial. Looking at dozens of implementations we've led or observed, those with experienced consultants consistently: · Complete on time or with minimal delays · Stay closer to budgeted costs · Deliver more of the promised business benefits · Create less disruption to ongoing operations Organisations embarking on ERP transformations during carve-outs, mergers, or other significant business changes face a choice: invest in experienced guidance upfront or pay far more in delays, overruns, and missed opportunities later. DIY-er, beware!
By Mark Aikman November 7, 2022
How to write reports that busy people will read
By Mark Aikman March 7, 2022
Thanks to our good friends at Future Processing for inviting us to make a guest appearance! On their blog, I've shared some ideas about what to consider in order to get best-fit suppliers: https://www.future-processing.com/blog/selecting-a-supplier-natural-selection/
By Mark Aikman October 19, 2021
IT's supplier relationship need to stop using the master-servant model. Partnership gets more done - and to a much higher standard.
By Sharon Gregory September 7, 2021
Ideas for analysing and dealing with resistance to change in transformation programmes
By Mark Aikman August 10, 2021
Considerations when transitioning from development to BAU
By Mark Aikman July 20, 2021
Support for surviving and thriving after the pandemic from Ignition Transformation
By Mark Aikman July 8, 2021
Three different leadership styles to steer you through a crisis
By Mark Aikman July 1, 2021
How to have better and/or fewer meetings
By Mark Aikman June 28, 2021
What to do when a wheel comes off #1
Show More