I don't need to see your workings-out

Mark Aikman • November 7, 2022

How to write reports that busy people will read

Reports. We need them to show how we’re doing. After all, that’s exactly what good governance is about. But holy guacamole, let’s get smart about it, eh?

Far too often, I see reports that tell me the inside leg measurement of last Wednesday’s cheese grater. Layer upon layer of detail, which look like the author is answering the brief “Write down everything you know about Topic X”. That’s not what I need as Programme Lead. Instead, I need to know anything that’s remarkable or concerning. Anything that’s where it should be is a given: so don’t bother telling me that there’s nothing to see here, whilst telling me what there is to see.

Therefore, my four tips for report writers who want to impress busy readers are:

1. Remember you’re trusted

Most over-detailed reports come from people who are covering the rear. They include everything about their project, so they’ll be able to prove they told-you-so if something goes wrong later. Some people even include all the guff because they’re not sure if they’ve spotted all the anomalies, and they’re using the reader as a safety net to catch anything they’ve missed.

But in a team built on trust, operating in a no-blame culture, this is entirely unnecessary. Report authors are trusted to spot what matters – and won’t be put in the Tower if they miss a bit. Therefore, the author’s view of what’s important is all that matters. And the reader doesn’t need to see all the workings-out.


2. The key skill is stating the key fact

For reports to be effective and helpful for busy readers, they need to be succinct. Just the key facts that the recipient will need to base decisions on. So, to edit what to put in and leave out, authors can ask themselves three crucial questions:


  • What are the critical ELEMENTS of this project at present – and of those, what’s wobbly or bubbly?
  • What’s the reader’s OBJECTIVE when reading this report – what do they want to get out of it?
  • What’s the reader going to DO with this report?

Those answers will help hugely in only selecting key facts issues to mention – whatever matters most to the project’s and the reader’s focus. If in doubt: ask the reader!


3. The exception is the rule

Less is very definitely more.

Everything that’s as it should be is … absolutely not newsworthy. So make sure your reports cover the exceptions only. Those include what’s interesting, such as items that are ahead of schedule, or below budget, all located in the good news bucket. Or items that are challenging us now – or MAY BECOME challenges in the future - which can go in the other part of the report: The Needs Attention Section.


4. Communicate without words

Finally. It doesn’t have to be a lot of words. Or a lot of numbers. Indeed, a lot of words/numbers take time and effort from a busy reader and significantly reduce the author’s chances that the item will even be read at all. Consider using graphics to convey content more succinctly.

As an example, think about pie-charts. Think how many words it will take to communicate the value of all the pie “slices”, comparative to each other, shown on a pie-chart. Then think how much quicker and more emphatic a pie-chart is in conveying the relationships between slices and you will then never write a comparative description of proportions in words again. Or how about a traffic light graphic – red, amber or green for going well, OK or there-may-be-trouble-ahead? Or maybe up, sideways and down arrows? ANYTHING, as long as it’s not eight pages of words describing the same things you wrote about last month!

May 9, 2025
Many companies initially believe they can handle complex ERP implementations internally. After all, who knows their business better? Grant du Preez of Ignition Transformation looks at what to consider before deciding to go it alone: and he’s a guy who’s seen all the elephant-traps. He advises:  Don’t underestimate how complicated it will be Enterprise Resource Planning implementations are challenging under normal circumstances. When layered onto major business transformations like carve-outs or mergers, they become exponentially more complex. These scenarios introduce unique challenges, such as: · Multiple legacy systems that must be harmonised · Interdependent business processes needing careful redesign · Data migration requiring deep technical expertise · Compressed timelines driven by business imperatives · Organisational resistance amid broader change And all that is needed simultaneously… At best you might see missed business opportunities if you can’t make the speed: at worst, you’ll spend too much or possibly even see a failed implementation. Remember Transition Service Agreements (TSAs) are real rules TSAs present some of the most significant challenges during carve-outs and acquisitions. These agreements typically impose strict and legally-binding deadlines for transitioning from parent company systems. There are substantial financial penalties for delays. Hard cash. To work within TSAs, you will need: · Proven strategies for meeting TSA deadlines · Templates for identifying and prioritising critical path items · Tactics for negotiating more favourable terms when necessary · Experience balancing short-term TSA requirements with long-term system needs It’s a Matterhorn-steep learning curve if you haven’t done it before. Make sure you have just one source of truth During business transformations, competing narratives inevitably emerge. Typically, there are strands on requirements, data structures, and implementation approaches. It soon becomes 3D chess. You will need to establish what we call a "single source of truth" – authoritative references for decisions that prevent revisiting settled issues. This includes: · Documented design decisions with clear ownership · Master data governance frameworks · Process models validated by business owners · Requirements traceability matrices Without this discipline, projects often circle Heathrow, cycling through the same decisions repeatedly, wasting valuable time and resources. You need to know what’s going on You will need complete transparency across all aspects of an ERP programme. Every day, you have to be in a position to give your stakeholders an unvarnished view of: · Project status against critical milestones · Resource allocation and utilisation · Emerging risks and mitigation strategies · Budget consumption and projections This transparency creates accountability and enables early intervention when issues arise. But it can’t be a hefty administrative burden that slows progress. Get the top corridor on board You will need to secure the right level of commitment from organisational leadership and key stakeholders. You will have to be clear about the specific involvement needed at different stages. Most importantly, you will need to be listened-to when you communicate these needs to busy executives. Executive steering committees, dedicated business process owners and carefully structured sign-off procedures will help ensure decisions are made by the right people at the right time. Without this orchestration, ERP implementations often stall waiting for critical decisions or proceed with insufficient business input. Remember DIY may only LOOK like the cheaper option Whilst engaging experienced consultants requires investment, the return is substantial. Looking at dozens of implementations we've led or observed, those with experienced consultants consistently: · Complete on time or with minimal delays · Stay closer to budgeted costs · Deliver more of the promised business benefits · Create less disruption to ongoing operations Organisations embarking on ERP transformations during carve-outs, mergers, or other significant business changes face a choice: invest in experienced guidance upfront or pay far more in delays, overruns, and missed opportunities later. DIY-er, beware!
May 7, 2025
Five questions to ask providers of business transformation programmes
By Mark Aikman March 7, 2022
Thanks to our good friends at Future Processing for inviting us to make a guest appearance! On their blog, I've shared some ideas about what to consider in order to get best-fit suppliers: https://www.future-processing.com/blog/selecting-a-supplier-natural-selection/
By Mark Aikman October 19, 2021
IT's supplier relationship need to stop using the master-servant model. Partnership gets more done - and to a much higher standard.
By Sharon Gregory September 7, 2021
Ideas for analysing and dealing with resistance to change in transformation programmes
By Mark Aikman August 10, 2021
Considerations when transitioning from development to BAU
By Mark Aikman July 20, 2021
Support for surviving and thriving after the pandemic from Ignition Transformation
By Mark Aikman July 8, 2021
Three different leadership styles to steer you through a crisis
By Mark Aikman July 1, 2021
How to have better and/or fewer meetings
By Mark Aikman June 28, 2021
What to do when a wheel comes off #1
Show More