The end of the beginning

Mark Aikman • August 10, 2021

Moving from development to support

When it comes to ending a transformation programme, it’s the little things that matter. As you transition from development to support, you are highly likely to be focused on the big stuff that needs to be tweaked/fixed/polished/delivered. But you’ll also need to keep an eye out for the twiddly bits on your clipboard with the Monumental Checklist of Things We Mustn’t Forget. It’s usually the little bits that make all the difference.

What are they, then? For me, there are six strands of activity you need to think about for transition. And within those, there are few easy-to-forget things that it’s essential to remember….

1. Don’t skimp on the communication

Everybody involved now needs to hear one more time the current position/destination/route/steps/ timing/etc, etc, etc. Interestingly, the communications piece here is often more straightforward than it has been at many previous stages - finally, after all these years, you’re seeing concrete reality approaching. Hallelujah – cue flags, bunting and a modestly-sized brass band. So go for your life with your Directorial Briefing Packs, customer interface seminars, staff countdown newsletters… whatever you think needs communicating.

But don’t forget the points-to-note reminders – which are very often about process change. For example, Eric will have been told that the report he usually runs on a Monday will now be out on a Tuesday and in a different format. But it’s wise to remind him and prepare him for the change now, a little way out, so that it is expected and more-normaller when it comes.


2. This is not just engagement; it’s active engagement

Yes, you’ve told everyone everything they need to know. At least twice. But for years, your project has been conceptual and a-long-way-in-the-future. Now it’s coming to life.

So the next consideration is to check everyone who matters – and that might be almost everyone involved – is actively engaged with this project. You need everyone switching on their full wattage to share knowledge and believe this now involves them. So for example:

BAU needs to be involved super-early, months before the go-live. Their processes work well now and they’ll have been involved in designing the new processes, but let’s get them thinking about all the ramifications of the new processes. They’ll spot problems, but they’ll also have ideas and solutions, ensuring accidents don’t happen.

Or take training. Of course you’ve thought of training. But here’s an idea - what might be done now to make all system users responsible for their own learning about the new system, so that they are, er, obliged to be actively engaged?


3. The dress rehearsal

Of course you’ll be chewing your way through ITIL – the giant ITIL manual on transition is taken as read. Implementing the prescribed steps and checks will avert most disasters.

But there’s always something that any amount of checks cannot avoid. So it’s cue spotlights: full dress rehearsal time. You’ll need costumes, props, and everyone knowing their lines. You need to involve key stakeholders, power-users and all the kit. You need the run-through to check what’s (not) working, what’s (not) connecting, and what’s fallen through the gap in the floorboards and cannot be prised out even with the breadknife and a bent coathanger.

Alongside that is remembering to check that there are the right resources in place to be able to cope, e.g. in BAU. Or whether in fact you need sign-off on more resources, followed by high-speed hiring and up-to-speeding. And, er, who’s going to do that?

You’ll also need to remember to tell everyone what we’ve got in the cupboard – what’s the service catalogue of all the offerings within the new system? And what’s the knowledge-base – how will system users find out the answers to their questions? Who can help them with what types of queries?


4. Prepare for problems

I think it’s easy to avoid preparing for a problem. We don’t forget about this, but we Transformers don’t like telling the sponsor/client that something might go wrong – it tends to make people a touch antsy. We also like to believe we’ve thought of everything (we write long lists on clipboards, you know, to be sure). But in fact, back in the real world, however much thought and innovation and testing and care we’ve used, the system ain’t going to be Grade AAA+ Class 1 perfect when it launches. With a lot of care and a bit of luck, any problems will have the status of snags and hiccups. But even these are still A Problem.

If A Problem happens, you’re aiming to score zero on the Headless Chicken Scale. You’ll need to be instantly prepared so that you know whose problem it is; and what they’re going to do about it.

That means you need to remember to create and discuss a Problem Escalation Protocol, which states at precisely what level the issue is the responsibility of the CIO; the Programme Sponsor; the Board and the CEO. Think of “discussing discomfort” as an essential part of your communication campaign and it might be a bit easier to talk about it…


5. Perfection is a work in progress

Despite all the above anticipatory thinking, you’re going to need a second edition of the new system far sooner than you’d planned. It’ll become clear on Day 2 that some stuff isn’t quite perfect. In fact, you probably already know some of the stuff that’s going into the Second Edition before launch.

Therefore, before you launch, you’re going to need a plan to fix all the stuff that wasn’t quite 100% by the time you went live. With space in it for the stuff you then found out didn’t meet the users’ expectations. Which means you need a plan for the second release date, even before you start…. Oh, and that means you’re straight back in development, and needing another delivery plan, too. Launch is the end of the first journey and the start of the second journey. Don’t forget to put that in big letters in your communications’ campaign.

Carry lessons over for the next time. Especially in multi-point/stage transformations, you will need constant objective assessments of lessons learned at every stage. In the relief of getting the ruddy thing out of the door, don’t forget to learn, review and change it for next for time. Once again, there’s no shame in not being perfect the first time – but shame on you if you make the same mistake twice.


6. It’s the little things…

And finally: don’t forget the printers – or whatever peripheral matter it is that you’ve probably forgotten, because smart people forget simple things. You need to check your fangle-dangle new system is configured so it speaks to the printers, or fits on the desks, or recognises the passwords, or isn’t scheduled to launch on Easter Monday.

The best way to do this is to ask a nice realistic person who has had nothing to do with the project to give you some suggestions of where their capable-but-IT-amateur eye thinks it might go wrong. They’ll be far more likely to spot the schoolboy error than you will from your ivory tower on the eighth floor.



This is an extract from Mark Aikman’s book Uncommon Sense: Alternative Thinking on Digital Transformation

Amazon location: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Uncommon-Sense-Alternative-Thinking-Transformation-ebook/dp/B08KSG513Q

Apple location: https://books.apple.com/gb/book/uncommon-sense/id1536877985


May 9, 2025
Many companies initially believe they can handle complex ERP implementations internally. After all, who knows their business better? Grant du Preez of Ignition Transformation looks at what to consider before deciding to go it alone: and he’s a guy who’s seen all the elephant-traps. He advises:  Don’t underestimate how complicated it will be Enterprise Resource Planning implementations are challenging under normal circumstances. When layered onto major business transformations like carve-outs or mergers, they become exponentially more complex. These scenarios introduce unique challenges, such as: · Multiple legacy systems that must be harmonised · Interdependent business processes needing careful redesign · Data migration requiring deep technical expertise · Compressed timelines driven by business imperatives · Organisational resistance amid broader change And all that is needed simultaneously… At best you might see missed business opportunities if you can’t make the speed: at worst, you’ll spend too much or possibly even see a failed implementation. Remember Transition Service Agreements (TSAs) are real rules TSAs present some of the most significant challenges during carve-outs and acquisitions. These agreements typically impose strict and legally-binding deadlines for transitioning from parent company systems. There are substantial financial penalties for delays. Hard cash. To work within TSAs, you will need: · Proven strategies for meeting TSA deadlines · Templates for identifying and prioritising critical path items · Tactics for negotiating more favourable terms when necessary · Experience balancing short-term TSA requirements with long-term system needs It’s a Matterhorn-steep learning curve if you haven’t done it before. Make sure you have just one source of truth During business transformations, competing narratives inevitably emerge. Typically, there are strands on requirements, data structures, and implementation approaches. It soon becomes 3D chess. You will need to establish what we call a "single source of truth" – authoritative references for decisions that prevent revisiting settled issues. This includes: · Documented design decisions with clear ownership · Master data governance frameworks · Process models validated by business owners · Requirements traceability matrices Without this discipline, projects often circle Heathrow, cycling through the same decisions repeatedly, wasting valuable time and resources. You need to know what’s going on You will need complete transparency across all aspects of an ERP programme. Every day, you have to be in a position to give your stakeholders an unvarnished view of: · Project status against critical milestones · Resource allocation and utilisation · Emerging risks and mitigation strategies · Budget consumption and projections This transparency creates accountability and enables early intervention when issues arise. But it can’t be a hefty administrative burden that slows progress. Get the top corridor on board You will need to secure the right level of commitment from organisational leadership and key stakeholders. You will have to be clear about the specific involvement needed at different stages. Most importantly, you will need to be listened-to when you communicate these needs to busy executives. Executive steering committees, dedicated business process owners and carefully structured sign-off procedures will help ensure decisions are made by the right people at the right time. Without this orchestration, ERP implementations often stall waiting for critical decisions or proceed with insufficient business input. Remember DIY may only LOOK like the cheaper option Whilst engaging experienced consultants requires investment, the return is substantial. Looking at dozens of implementations we've led or observed, those with experienced consultants consistently: · Complete on time or with minimal delays · Stay closer to budgeted costs · Deliver more of the promised business benefits · Create less disruption to ongoing operations Organisations embarking on ERP transformations during carve-outs, mergers, or other significant business changes face a choice: invest in experienced guidance upfront or pay far more in delays, overruns, and missed opportunities later. DIY-er, beware!
May 7, 2025
Five questions to ask providers of business transformation programmes
By Mark Aikman November 7, 2022
How to write reports that busy people will read
By Mark Aikman March 7, 2022
Thanks to our good friends at Future Processing for inviting us to make a guest appearance! On their blog, I've shared some ideas about what to consider in order to get best-fit suppliers: https://www.future-processing.com/blog/selecting-a-supplier-natural-selection/
By Mark Aikman October 19, 2021
IT's supplier relationship need to stop using the master-servant model. Partnership gets more done - and to a much higher standard.
By Sharon Gregory September 7, 2021
Ideas for analysing and dealing with resistance to change in transformation programmes
By Mark Aikman July 20, 2021
Support for surviving and thriving after the pandemic from Ignition Transformation
By Mark Aikman July 8, 2021
Three different leadership styles to steer you through a crisis
By Mark Aikman July 1, 2021
How to have better and/or fewer meetings
By Mark Aikman June 28, 2021
What to do when a wheel comes off #1
Show More