Control less to achieve more  

Mark Aikman • October 19, 2021

Partnership working. It’s been around in other business disciplines for decades, but weirdly in IT, we seem very reluctant to fully embrace it. We seem to be stuck with the paradigm that, as programme owner or client, it’s our responsibility to be the only Superhero who can solve the problem. Once we’ve identified the Plan, we can then bring in and control suppliers to deliver it. Under strict instruction and close scrutiny, naturally.

I strongly disagree with this approach. The CIO or programme lead is never the World’s Expert In Everything. Other subject matter experts in our industry – true, talented specialists - will always know more than I do about their topic. So I’m entirely prepared to ask them for their advice, and then work with them as a partner, rather than as their master.

I have three key ideas for developing a productive partnership with true experts:

1. Partner early

When Chief Marketing Officers brief an advertising agency for a TV commercial, they don’t tell the creative team which actors to use or what the background music should be. They simply state the required communication outcome for the brand. But when some CIOs have a required outcome, they feel they need to specify the exact solutions, products and suppliers required, before ever involving a provider. And many go straight to specifying solutions without ever fully developing a fully-laid-out strategy.

This really is a missed opportunity. It is highly likely that a talented partner with the appropriate skills will be much more adept at selecting the best solution than the CIO. So Tip 1 is: involve that partner early enough – when you’re still bringing together the problem statement. A high-quality partner will be really useful in getting to the specifics of the problem – and may well know more about the choice of solutions open to you. The partner will bring a wide knowledge of previous projects like yours and will know what works best in which circumstances.

Bear in mind that this partner is not necessarily a vendor. There are a growing number of IT strategy and solution advisers who have experience of the products in our marketplace, but no vested interest in any particular ERP, security or communication platform.


2. Partner intellectually

Real partners are on the same page. Both parties want a successful outcome and want the solution to be the very best it can be. They have a shared vision of success.

It’s worth spending some time agreeing what success will look like. This includes timescales and content – just as you usually agree – but might also include ownership of intellectual property or any ambitions by both parties to break new ground.

Shake hands on it. Then take a deep breath, gather all your courage: and choose to TRUST these people to deliver. I have invariably found that when I offer trust, and listen open-mindedly to the partner’s ideas, they have delivered fairly – and usually more than generously – against their contracted obligations. Conflicts are rare when everyone feels they’re getting a fair deal and communication is between equals.

Once you are partnering with vendors, listen to their advice. If they are invested in your shared vision, they will only offer your routes and options that will achieve the vision. It’s not in their interests to sell you stuff you don’t need, because it IS in their interests for your trust and your partnership to continue. The bright ones understand that it’s wise not to irritate you by over-stuffing the package.


3. Partner practically

Partnering is not just about the bosses slapping each other on the back and going out for a curry! The partnership must be reflected practically and at all levels in the programme team. One of my all-time favourite examples of this was when working with Future Processing on a highly sensitive and complex transformation.

We were very keen to avoid “us and them” or “master-slave” relationships. Future Processing had some great ideas for solutions, but the client also needed in-house expertise and ownership for the longer term. So we simply mixed it up. We used shared ownership of the programme workstreams, with some strands lead by the partner team, and others by a member of the client team. We then created hybrid teams for each workstream, combining representatives of both organisations. Any “two tribes” perceptions were immediately eliminated, with everyone concentrating solely on delivering an excellent outcome for their workstream. Colleagues worked together in person and online, at high speed.

I firmly believe that working in partnership creates better solutions than the command-and-control model. But partnership working demands that we trust good suppliers. That’s not a problem for me. I believe that really good people will not rip us off – because it’s not in their own best interests. They know that under-delivery or over-selling means they’ll never get a second contract; a reference; a referral; a boost to their brand; or another project when this CIO moves jobs. Good people are smart enough to have worked out the importance of delivering fair value to the continuation of their brand and their business.

So trust them! Because true partnership working gives us enhanced productivity; cleverer solutions; new skills and satisfying work for our teams; and some genuine friendships. And that, as I learned from Future Processing, is pronounced “przyjazn”!


May 9, 2025
Many companies initially believe they can handle complex ERP implementations internally. After all, who knows their business better? Grant du Preez of Ignition Transformation looks at what to consider before deciding to go it alone: and he’s a guy who’s seen all the elephant-traps. He advises:  Don’t underestimate how complicated it will be Enterprise Resource Planning implementations are challenging under normal circumstances. When layered onto major business transformations like carve-outs or mergers, they become exponentially more complex. These scenarios introduce unique challenges, such as: · Multiple legacy systems that must be harmonised · Interdependent business processes needing careful redesign · Data migration requiring deep technical expertise · Compressed timelines driven by business imperatives · Organisational resistance amid broader change And all that is needed simultaneously… At best you might see missed business opportunities if you can’t make the speed: at worst, you’ll spend too much or possibly even see a failed implementation. Remember Transition Service Agreements (TSAs) are real rules TSAs present some of the most significant challenges during carve-outs and acquisitions. These agreements typically impose strict and legally-binding deadlines for transitioning from parent company systems. There are substantial financial penalties for delays. Hard cash. To work within TSAs, you will need: · Proven strategies for meeting TSA deadlines · Templates for identifying and prioritising critical path items · Tactics for negotiating more favourable terms when necessary · Experience balancing short-term TSA requirements with long-term system needs It’s a Matterhorn-steep learning curve if you haven’t done it before. Make sure you have just one source of truth During business transformations, competing narratives inevitably emerge. Typically, there are strands on requirements, data structures, and implementation approaches. It soon becomes 3D chess. You will need to establish what we call a "single source of truth" – authoritative references for decisions that prevent revisiting settled issues. This includes: · Documented design decisions with clear ownership · Master data governance frameworks · Process models validated by business owners · Requirements traceability matrices Without this discipline, projects often circle Heathrow, cycling through the same decisions repeatedly, wasting valuable time and resources. You need to know what’s going on You will need complete transparency across all aspects of an ERP programme. Every day, you have to be in a position to give your stakeholders an unvarnished view of: · Project status against critical milestones · Resource allocation and utilisation · Emerging risks and mitigation strategies · Budget consumption and projections This transparency creates accountability and enables early intervention when issues arise. But it can’t be a hefty administrative burden that slows progress. Get the top corridor on board You will need to secure the right level of commitment from organisational leadership and key stakeholders. You will have to be clear about the specific involvement needed at different stages. Most importantly, you will need to be listened-to when you communicate these needs to busy executives. Executive steering committees, dedicated business process owners and carefully structured sign-off procedures will help ensure decisions are made by the right people at the right time. Without this orchestration, ERP implementations often stall waiting for critical decisions or proceed with insufficient business input. Remember DIY may only LOOK like the cheaper option Whilst engaging experienced consultants requires investment, the return is substantial. Looking at dozens of implementations we've led or observed, those with experienced consultants consistently: · Complete on time or with minimal delays · Stay closer to budgeted costs · Deliver more of the promised business benefits · Create less disruption to ongoing operations Organisations embarking on ERP transformations during carve-outs, mergers, or other significant business changes face a choice: invest in experienced guidance upfront or pay far more in delays, overruns, and missed opportunities later. DIY-er, beware!
May 7, 2025
Five questions to ask providers of business transformation programmes
By Mark Aikman November 7, 2022
How to write reports that busy people will read
By Mark Aikman March 7, 2022
Thanks to our good friends at Future Processing for inviting us to make a guest appearance! On their blog, I've shared some ideas about what to consider in order to get best-fit suppliers: https://www.future-processing.com/blog/selecting-a-supplier-natural-selection/
By Sharon Gregory September 7, 2021
Ideas for analysing and dealing with resistance to change in transformation programmes
By Mark Aikman August 10, 2021
Considerations when transitioning from development to BAU
By Mark Aikman July 20, 2021
Support for surviving and thriving after the pandemic from Ignition Transformation
By Mark Aikman July 8, 2021
Three different leadership styles to steer you through a crisis
By Mark Aikman July 1, 2021
How to have better and/or fewer meetings
By Mark Aikman June 28, 2021
What to do when a wheel comes off #1
Show More