Ninety days that will define the decade

Mark Aikman • June 8, 2020

IT now has a unique opportunity to take a leadership role

In IT we are just beginning the most crucial three months of the 2020s. We currently have a unique and long-awaited chance to show business leadership through IT. But I believe it will only be an open window of opportunity until September, as governments worldwide ask many organisations to open up again and contribute to rebuilding the world economy.

No-one needs reminding that we’ve just experienced the weirdest and most disruptive three months of our working lives; and for many people, the saddest and hardest three months. At work, strategies, plans, operating procedures, expectations and even workplaces have been turned on their heads. People who would never have entertained radical change have had it thrust upon them. Some were ducks to water; most swam; a few sank. It has been a period of full-on disruption in both its old-fashioned and trendy new senses.

In many organisations, this degree of change is not being owned. Instead, it’s being seen as an externally-imposed challenge, something to be got-through-and-put-behind-us. In this context, it presents a once in a decade – maybe once in a career – moment of opportunity for IT to take firm ownership, whilst minds are still open to new thinking.

Anyone who is frustrated by IT taking a second-fiddle role (being the facilitator/implementer, not the designer) has to take action immediately. He/she needs to do something this week: sit in a darkened room and have a good think. How can you use this unprecedented sidestep away from normal to reposition IT as a leading force in your organisation?

Take a torch into your darkened room and try these questions out:


  • What will stop your organisation working to its full potential in The New Normal? Where can you apply IT to facilitate it getting back to full speed?
  • What typical thinking is preventing the organisation from using ideas like those you had in the answer to Q1? Who is driving/is the source of this obstructive thinking? How can you influence that thinking at source? Whose ear(s) do you need to bend?
  • What do you expect will be the resistance to your solutions? Put your torch on at this point: this will be a long list, from Brian in Accounts not liking newfangled processes; to shortage of budget; to lack of understanding of the benefits of your nifty ideas. For each point of resistance, write down a solution.

In your darkened room, you’ll then be the proud owner of three lists, entitled What, Who and How.

Of course, many of you are reading this and are quite rightly thinking. “Yeah, I already know all my answers to those questions, so no need for thinking in any darkened rooms, which would be an even weirder thing to do than the stuff I’ve been doing since March.” For you, my fourth questions is:


  • If you know What needs to be done, with Whom, and How, then what’s stopping you doing it? Why haven’t you started already?

I strongly believe that a door that’s been closed for years to many people in IT has been pushed ajar by the pandemic. It will slam shut again by September, as people snuggle back into their comfort zone, doggedly seeking The Old Normal or accepting the muddle-through approach. IT needs to jam a collective foot in that door.

An excellent resource is The First 90 Days by Michael Watkins. It assumes you are at the start of a new role; in fact, we all may as well be.

Don't squander your once in a decade chance of being heard. You have 90 days…

May 9, 2025
Many companies initially believe they can handle complex ERP implementations internally. After all, who knows their business better? Grant du Preez of Ignition Transformation looks at what to consider before deciding to go it alone: and he’s a guy who’s seen all the elephant-traps. He advises:  Don’t underestimate how complicated it will be Enterprise Resource Planning implementations are challenging under normal circumstances. When layered onto major business transformations like carve-outs or mergers, they become exponentially more complex. These scenarios introduce unique challenges, such as: · Multiple legacy systems that must be harmonised · Interdependent business processes needing careful redesign · Data migration requiring deep technical expertise · Compressed timelines driven by business imperatives · Organisational resistance amid broader change And all that is needed simultaneously… At best you might see missed business opportunities if you can’t make the speed: at worst, you’ll spend too much or possibly even see a failed implementation. Remember Transition Service Agreements (TSAs) are real rules TSAs present some of the most significant challenges during carve-outs and acquisitions. These agreements typically impose strict and legally-binding deadlines for transitioning from parent company systems. There are substantial financial penalties for delays. Hard cash. To work within TSAs, you will need: · Proven strategies for meeting TSA deadlines · Templates for identifying and prioritising critical path items · Tactics for negotiating more favourable terms when necessary · Experience balancing short-term TSA requirements with long-term system needs It’s a Matterhorn-steep learning curve if you haven’t done it before. Make sure you have just one source of truth During business transformations, competing narratives inevitably emerge. Typically, there are strands on requirements, data structures, and implementation approaches. It soon becomes 3D chess. You will need to establish what we call a "single source of truth" – authoritative references for decisions that prevent revisiting settled issues. This includes: · Documented design decisions with clear ownership · Master data governance frameworks · Process models validated by business owners · Requirements traceability matrices Without this discipline, projects often circle Heathrow, cycling through the same decisions repeatedly, wasting valuable time and resources. You need to know what’s going on You will need complete transparency across all aspects of an ERP programme. Every day, you have to be in a position to give your stakeholders an unvarnished view of: · Project status against critical milestones · Resource allocation and utilisation · Emerging risks and mitigation strategies · Budget consumption and projections This transparency creates accountability and enables early intervention when issues arise. But it can’t be a hefty administrative burden that slows progress. Get the top corridor on board You will need to secure the right level of commitment from organisational leadership and key stakeholders. You will have to be clear about the specific involvement needed at different stages. Most importantly, you will need to be listened-to when you communicate these needs to busy executives. Executive steering committees, dedicated business process owners and carefully structured sign-off procedures will help ensure decisions are made by the right people at the right time. Without this orchestration, ERP implementations often stall waiting for critical decisions or proceed with insufficient business input. Remember DIY may only LOOK like the cheaper option Whilst engaging experienced consultants requires investment, the return is substantial. Looking at dozens of implementations we've led or observed, those with experienced consultants consistently: · Complete on time or with minimal delays · Stay closer to budgeted costs · Deliver more of the promised business benefits · Create less disruption to ongoing operations Organisations embarking on ERP transformations during carve-outs, mergers, or other significant business changes face a choice: invest in experienced guidance upfront or pay far more in delays, overruns, and missed opportunities later. DIY-er, beware!
May 7, 2025
Five questions to ask providers of business transformation programmes
By Mark Aikman November 7, 2022
How to write reports that busy people will read
By Mark Aikman March 7, 2022
Thanks to our good friends at Future Processing for inviting us to make a guest appearance! On their blog, I've shared some ideas about what to consider in order to get best-fit suppliers: https://www.future-processing.com/blog/selecting-a-supplier-natural-selection/
By Mark Aikman October 19, 2021
IT's supplier relationship need to stop using the master-servant model. Partnership gets more done - and to a much higher standard.
By Sharon Gregory September 7, 2021
Ideas for analysing and dealing with resistance to change in transformation programmes
By Mark Aikman August 10, 2021
Considerations when transitioning from development to BAU
By Mark Aikman July 20, 2021
Support for surviving and thriving after the pandemic from Ignition Transformation
By Mark Aikman July 8, 2021
Three different leadership styles to steer you through a crisis
By Mark Aikman July 1, 2021
How to have better and/or fewer meetings
Show More