High-speed deployment: a masterclass from the NHS

Mark Aikman • April 21, 2021

I’ve had my jab! It’s just like everyone tells you, me and the Missus: entrance to exit in six minutes.

On the way home, I’ve been sharing my observations on how transformation deployment can learn from the UK’s Covid-19 vaccine programme. Strangely, Our Lass spent most of this discourse looking out of the car window and reading her texts, so I’m going to share the lessons as I see them with you, who I find to be a much more appreciative audience.

So what is the vaccine roll-out demonstrating about high-speed deployment?

The importance of a clear objective. Everyone in the country has heard a thousand times that the aim is to “offer the vaccine to all adults by July 2021”. That’s the programme objective.

It’s simple, clear and easy to understand and not full of complicated caveats. Communicated in nine words.

And it’s given the deployment programme team clear sight of what their priorities are: offer the jab, jab everyone who can be persuaded to come forward, do it fast – and six minutes to process two Aikmans is pretty fast.

The value of collaborative working. This roll-out is undoubtedly one of the best collaborations the country has ever seen. We think of it as the work of the NHS, who are clearly leading players; but it also includes the logistical brilliance of the army; co-operation from private business, from High Street pharmacies to pharmaceutical giants; involvement of the third sector, from access to mosques and cathedrals as vaccination centres to the thousands of volunteers directing people around the car parks.

Clearly, everybody has the shared aim of Getting a Good Thing Done. No visible territories, grandstanding or glory-grabbing. IT deployment can only work quickly if it takes the same approach. Good leadership fosters collaborative working; and in turn collaborative working gets unimpeded results.

Shop local. Leading on from collaboration, the programme is a great example of taking the advice of local experts. All kinds of contributors have been allowed to bring to bear their expertise. So we’ve seen bowling alley facilities managers help set up their premises as vaccination centres; GPs work out which patients won’t be able to book online; and Social Services contribute ideas for taking mobile vaccinations centres to the homeless.

Crucially, all these people with specialist knowledge and expertise have been listened-to and allowed to contribute to decision-making. Rapid deployment in IT transformation always benefits from that style of ears-and-mind-open listening…

How to work in phases. I’ll wager you could all tell me which phase you were/are in for your jabs. Right from the start, it was made clear that there would be two key phases (over/under 50s), with subdivisions to each phase. The programme has stuck to those rules, despite many suggestions of the thousand other ways there are to skin a cat.

Nobody attempted Big Bang. It has never been complicated or difficult to understand which phase we are currently in, or what the timing of that phase is. Consequently, expectations are being beautifully managed.

As with all phased programmes, it has been possible to improve the deployment, as the team learned as they went. Remember at the start – people were being jabbed with both shots in a four-week window? The scientists then discovered the doses would go further and be more effective if they were delivered in a 12-week window. So Phase 1b just calmly changed the plan. No drama: more lives saved.

Governance by measurement . I bet you can also tell me roughly how many UK adults have been vaccinated up to today. This programme has been a masterclass in how to demonstrate progress by numbers. Every day, we’re updated on increased first jabs and second jabs; and the corresponding decline of infection and mortality rates.

Now admittedly, very few programmes are resourced with the statistical capability that shows proven progress by the day – but I think for the rest of my career I will use this roll-out as a beacon-reminder of the importance of measuring and communicating progress. Which leads me onto…

Communicating consistently . Another thing we’ll all remember for a long time is the communication used in the early days of the pandemic. The legendary “Stay at home; go to work; use public transport; don’t use public transport” had my Comms colleague purple in the face. But with the vaccination programme, all former communication errors have been consigned to the realm of nostalgia-comedy.

This time, messaging coming from within the programme is crystal clear. How many times has the PM said; “when you are offered your jab, take it”? The metrics are consistent, day after day. The format for delivering key messages – the three-person press conference – is now reassuringly dull.

In all deployment programmes, there’s no limit to how often you should repeat your message until everyone has heard and had time to believe it. And who could resist a technicolor Van Tam word-picture to bring it all to life?

Calm flexibility . Things will inevitably go wrong in any deployment. The leaders of the vaccine roll-out have faced (to our knowledge, as a minimum) vaccine supply problems and shortages; international political rows; and patient scepticism, distrust and even fear. There’s no sign of anyone flouncing out or tipping over tables. They have just calmly got on with it.

They’ve shown all deployment teams the importance of calm flexibility. They’ve sourced additional vaccines; managed stakeholder expectations; and communicated clearly and intelligently about risks.

The programme – the biggest of its kind ever attempted in this country - is still motoring and is still world-class. And it’s showing those of us in IT transformation just what can be done, at scale and at speed.

Professionally, I’m beyond impressed. As a citizen, I’m bursting with pride. And we two Aikmans, on a personal level, are very grateful indeed.


Mark Aikman is the author of Uncommon Sense: Alternative Thinking on Digital Transformation

Amazon location: https://www.amazon.co.uk/Uncommon-Sense-Alternative-Thinking-Transformation-ebook/dp/B08KSG513Q

Apple location: https://books.apple.com/gb/book/uncommon-sense/id1536877985



May 9, 2025
Many companies initially believe they can handle complex ERP implementations internally. After all, who knows their business better? Grant du Preez of Ignition Transformation looks at what to consider before deciding to go it alone: and he’s a guy who’s seen all the elephant-traps. He advises:  Don’t underestimate how complicated it will be Enterprise Resource Planning implementations are challenging under normal circumstances. When layered onto major business transformations like carve-outs or mergers, they become exponentially more complex. These scenarios introduce unique challenges, such as: · Multiple legacy systems that must be harmonised · Interdependent business processes needing careful redesign · Data migration requiring deep technical expertise · Compressed timelines driven by business imperatives · Organisational resistance amid broader change And all that is needed simultaneously… At best you might see missed business opportunities if you can’t make the speed: at worst, you’ll spend too much or possibly even see a failed implementation. Remember Transition Service Agreements (TSAs) are real rules TSAs present some of the most significant challenges during carve-outs and acquisitions. These agreements typically impose strict and legally-binding deadlines for transitioning from parent company systems. There are substantial financial penalties for delays. Hard cash. To work within TSAs, you will need: · Proven strategies for meeting TSA deadlines · Templates for identifying and prioritising critical path items · Tactics for negotiating more favourable terms when necessary · Experience balancing short-term TSA requirements with long-term system needs It’s a Matterhorn-steep learning curve if you haven’t done it before. Make sure you have just one source of truth During business transformations, competing narratives inevitably emerge. Typically, there are strands on requirements, data structures, and implementation approaches. It soon becomes 3D chess. You will need to establish what we call a "single source of truth" – authoritative references for decisions that prevent revisiting settled issues. This includes: · Documented design decisions with clear ownership · Master data governance frameworks · Process models validated by business owners · Requirements traceability matrices Without this discipline, projects often circle Heathrow, cycling through the same decisions repeatedly, wasting valuable time and resources. You need to know what’s going on You will need complete transparency across all aspects of an ERP programme. Every day, you have to be in a position to give your stakeholders an unvarnished view of: · Project status against critical milestones · Resource allocation and utilisation · Emerging risks and mitigation strategies · Budget consumption and projections This transparency creates accountability and enables early intervention when issues arise. But it can’t be a hefty administrative burden that slows progress. Get the top corridor on board You will need to secure the right level of commitment from organisational leadership and key stakeholders. You will have to be clear about the specific involvement needed at different stages. Most importantly, you will need to be listened-to when you communicate these needs to busy executives. Executive steering committees, dedicated business process owners and carefully structured sign-off procedures will help ensure decisions are made by the right people at the right time. Without this orchestration, ERP implementations often stall waiting for critical decisions or proceed with insufficient business input. Remember DIY may only LOOK like the cheaper option Whilst engaging experienced consultants requires investment, the return is substantial. Looking at dozens of implementations we've led or observed, those with experienced consultants consistently: · Complete on time or with minimal delays · Stay closer to budgeted costs · Deliver more of the promised business benefits · Create less disruption to ongoing operations Organisations embarking on ERP transformations during carve-outs, mergers, or other significant business changes face a choice: invest in experienced guidance upfront or pay far more in delays, overruns, and missed opportunities later. DIY-er, beware!
May 7, 2025
Five questions to ask providers of business transformation programmes
By Mark Aikman November 7, 2022
How to write reports that busy people will read
By Mark Aikman March 7, 2022
Thanks to our good friends at Future Processing for inviting us to make a guest appearance! On their blog, I've shared some ideas about what to consider in order to get best-fit suppliers: https://www.future-processing.com/blog/selecting-a-supplier-natural-selection/
By Mark Aikman October 19, 2021
IT's supplier relationship need to stop using the master-servant model. Partnership gets more done - and to a much higher standard.
By Sharon Gregory September 7, 2021
Ideas for analysing and dealing with resistance to change in transformation programmes
By Mark Aikman August 10, 2021
Considerations when transitioning from development to BAU
By Mark Aikman July 20, 2021
Support for surviving and thriving after the pandemic from Ignition Transformation
By Mark Aikman July 8, 2021
Three different leadership styles to steer you through a crisis
By Mark Aikman July 1, 2021
How to have better and/or fewer meetings
Show More